Nitin Singh

Riley ClementI have a follow up question on this. For the same infeasible model (now I am not filtering down any constraint for this relaxation exercise):If I try model.feasRelax as follows: self....

I just did that. Thanks.My bad that I thought it was a boolean.

But what if I don't want the relaxation to play with the variable bounds, but only the RHS of the constraints? 

Comment:I attempted to use gp.LinExpr(). Is my below prototype correct? model.addConstrs(         (             gp.LinExpr(               (1.0, x[c1, c2])               for (c1, c2) in d[(s1, s...

yes, this helps. Thanks for the answers. 

Thanks. Is there anyway I can simple use the constraint names defined earlier to access the expression rather than having an object defined for them?

Thanks,That did work in my case and I could access constraint names using the indexes.I have a follow up question: How can I now access the Left hand side of a certain constraint i.e. the expressio...