spineda

No, instances differ because some of the parameters are different.

Ok, I did that. I was expecting the indicator formulation to consistently outperform the big-M reformulation when using the same bounds, but that’s not always the case. In fact, I implemented three...

Thanks again. I’ve now run all simulations with the indicator constraints, using the same bounds I had for the other methods, and the results have improved significantly. So it makes more sense to ...

Thanks a lot Riley, that example is very illustrative and I finally understand what Gurobi is doing internally. 

Thanks Riley, I think I get your point. So what you're saying is that I can use knowledge about the problem to compute bounds on RHS, feed them to Gurobi, and still get some benefits from the indic...

Dear Riley,Thank you very much for your reply.Yes, the problem is similar to the one you pointed out.What I don’t understand is the following: if Gurobi is able to find 62 solutions, with 12 of the...

Dear Riley,Thanks for the reply.I have another example to this repository (https://github.com/salvapineda/gurobi_indicator) including a .mps file and a .py file to read it and execute with a feasib...