Harichai Sae-yong
- 合計アクティビティ 11
- 前回のアクティビティ
- メンバー登録日
- フォロー 0ユーザー
- フォロワー 0ユーザー
- 投票 0
- サブスクリプション 1
コメント
Harichai Sae-yongによる最近のアクティビティ-
Hello Riley, Constraint in this section. It will look for advance jobs or late jobs.The result is that if the result is positive, it indicates that the work is completed before the deadline.But if ...
-
How should I solve this constraint? for l in range(len(calendar_list)): model.addConstrs(gp_gap_worktime[(calendar_list[l], order)] == gp.quicksum(gp_manpower_worktime[(date, manpower, orde...
-
Hello Riley, I’m not sure I understand, This is the constraint after adding timeslot_list. # CONSTRAINTS# Number of manpowers should be less than or equal to the capacitymodel.addConstrs(gp_manpo...
-
In fact, the work in each order will have different importance in repairing. This is given in priority score, but if the orders are optimized to be executed on the same day, the order can be swappe...
-
Yes you understand correctly time list is not included in the model. The desired result will be a Gantt chart that will be the work schedule. I'm still not sure about defining conditions that are e...
-
This is my table code. time_list = ["one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten", "eleven", "twelve"]rows = manpower_list.copy()columns = calendar_list.copy()sub_co...
-
What is needed is not to make each order no division of labor. But I just want the command to work with division work start in the same column. If you look at it in terms of time, you have to start...
-
Hello Riley, model.addConstrs(gp_order_status.sum("*", order) == 1 for order in order_list)model.addConstrs(gp_manpower_status[date, manpower, order] <= gp_order_status[date, order] for date in cal...
-
Hello Riley,Thank you for answering my question.These are the VARIABLES that I use, where manpower_list is a list of workers' names, order_list is the order numbers, and calendar_list is the day th...