Runfeng Yu

Hi Jaromił, I’m very pleased to hear your good news. As a Gurobi user, it’s an honor to have identified such an issue, and I’m delighted that it will be resolved in the next version. Gurobi is the ...

Hi Jaromił, It’s great to hear from you. I know that you have all been working. Identifying problems is often simple or happens by chance, but solving them is indeed a complex task. I look forward ...

Hi Jaromił,  Deeply thank you for your help. Looking forward to your good news. 

Hi Jaromił,  Here are the two models in .lp format.  https://1drv.ms/f/c/5fddeb3c4240ada2/EgjCx6zP4ShJn4K8aHhuiqcBunzcGxQLliQDHvG5ejcGUA?e=rpVtU3  These files are a bit large. I hope they will be h...

Hello Jaromił Najman！Nice to meet you again and sorry for reply you so late because of busy days. Yes, I use the latest version 11.0.3.

Hi Elisabeth, Thank for your reply! And it really helps.  Best regards,Runfeng

Hi Jonasz, Thank you for your plain explanation and timely reply!And I will try this method to recreate my codes. Best regards,Runfeng

Hi Jaromił, Thanks for your patient answer, now I finally understand how it works！ Best regards, Runfeng  

Hi Jaromił,  Sorry, I am still confused about this problem. Based on the 393rd second of the log, gurobi obtains the feasible solution 2314681.2478. In the next process, gurobi looks for other poss...

Hi Jaromił, Thank you very much for answering my questions.Here is my understanding： In the above question, 2314681.02 is the best feasible point Gurobi found. However, although this point is the b...