Margi Shah

Hi Jaromil, What I expect is I have to give initial value i.e Resources [1,0] but the optimization should start from time step 1. As you can see below, I am using Energy resource variable in my obj...

Hi Jaromil,Jaromił Najman Apologies for the late reply as something unfortunate happened. I will show you why the constraint is not working: I have made one change in my time list : time = list()fo...

By the Output I mean that When I saw my values of Resource variables after optimization, I can see that Resource balance constraint is violated. 

Yes, I checked my resource Balance constraints in LP file, and it seems correct to me. But the output does not seem to be correct. Can you please check if my indent is correct in this constraint?

Many thanks Jaromil for this explanation. With your time & explanation, I was able to make the model feasible for the very first time ever. However, the results are not as expected. So, I was analy...

Many Thanks Jaromil for the explanation. However, I find that my algorithm takes much time (5 hrs approx.) to finish. The same model on a different PC with same specifications takes around 30 minut...

Hey, Jaromił Najman , Is it possible to have an in-between infeasible solution in the "Current Node" Column? i.e: objective of the associated relaxation value?  229292 12986 infeasible  102      79...

Hi Jaromil, Below is the log file Gurobi has generated, I want to understand what it means. I am showing initial few lines & last few lines. Could you please let me know what it actually means? Thi...

Hi Jaromil, Huge thanks for this wonderful explanation. This seems very detailed one. I understood the logic behind it. constr1[1]: Tasks[145,0] + Tasks[145,1] + Tasks[145,2] + Tasks[145,3] .........

Hi Jaromil, Many thanks for making me clear regarding the concept of Indicator Constraints. I have few doubts with regards to it if you can answer: First of all, briefing out the constraint formula...