Tushar Goyal
- Total activity 10
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 0
- Subscriptions 1
Comments
Recent activity by Tushar Goyal-
Hi Jeromil Bounding the variables indeed solved the problem. The results are physically wrong, but that's the issue with problem formulation that I have to solve. Could you elaborate on what bar...
-
Let me know the results of your investigation. I did try the non-convex formulation prior to convex formulation. Unfortunately, the same numerical issues persisted.
-
The substitutions you mentioned can indeed be made on paper. These simplifications can be done because while implementing the cone constraints, some variables are repeated on both LHS and RHS. If I...
-
Hi Jaromił Najman Could you elaborate on what reformulation we are doing here? I do not understand the terms. Are C0, C30004, C9003, C30005, C30006 and C30004 are the new variables that I need to d...
-
Please find the mathematical formulation of the model at https://www.filemail.com/d/ibaxjcixhyqamyx I tried to normalise the variables but that deteriorated the coefficient ranges. Let me know the...
-
Update. I tried with the following settings too but they did not solve the problem unfortunately. Do you advise me to try anything else? opts = sdpsettings( 'debug',1, ... 'solve...
-
Hi Jaromił Najman I updated to the latest version and implemented BarHomogeneous algorithm. Unfortunately, the problem still persists. Please find the MPS model here: https://www.filemail.com/d/apm...
-
The residuals increase in the output: + Solver chosen : GUROBI-GUROBI+ Processing objective function+ Processing constraints+ Calling GUROBIAcademic license - for non-commercial use only - expires ...