Robert Hildebrand
- Total activity 24
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 1
- Subscriptions 6
Activity overview
Latest activity by Robert Hildebrand-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
I see. I can write it by using m.Params.logfile = "myfile.log"
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
I updated to Gurobi 9.5.2, but I am getting the same error with writing the log file: I can run m.write("myfile.sol")m.write("myfile.lp")m.write("myfile.log") But then I get the error GurobiError:...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
Thanks! I didn't know about this functionality. That's very helpful.
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
A sensitivity analysis package in the GUROBI TOOLs github hub would be a fantastic thing to add! This would make teaching introductory courses with gurobi much easier. Perhaps also a function to d...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
Is there a python version of GRBBinvRowi? https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/7.5/refman/c_grbbinvrowi.html This is what I want to get access to. I suppose, if not, I could the B^{-1} matrix b...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
1. Thanks. I didn't know that you could access the presolved model. That's exciting. 2. Then the question is, if we solve the LP relaxation, is there a way to look at the tabluea. That is, ...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
If you're on a windows computer, you need to execute the setup.py file using the python located in your anaconda distribution. Here are my instructions for installing gurobi/anaconda: Installin...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
Yeah, MIPFocus =1 doesn't do anything. The starting solution that I feed it is probably optimal. Sure, I'll try making these lazy constraints. I'll also try a Lagrangian Relaxation to see if th...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
The complicating constraints are actually flow constraints: m.addConstrs(( sum(F[e[0],e[1],j] for e in H.in_edges(i)) - sum(F[a[0],a[1],j] for a in H.out_edges(i)) == X[i,j] for i in V for j in V i...
-
Robert Hildebrand commented,
(That last log is from the original model) I'm surprised that it gets stuck on 3.61 as the best bound that it can find.