Why is Gurobi taking so much time to find a feasible solution with a gap value?

Hi, I have used Gurobi to solve a model. However, it takes a long time to find a feasible solution with a gap value. Is there any solution to speed up the running time? Here is the output. It takes over 7000s to find the first feasilbe solution with a gap value.

Gurobi Optimizer version 10.0.0 build v10.0.0rc2 (win64)
CPU model: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz, instruction set [SSE2|AVX|AVX2|AVX512]
Thread count: 4 physical cores, 8 logical processors, using up to 8 threads
Optimize a model with 98150 rows, 1555757 columns and 16206463 nonzeros
Model fingerprint: 0xacbcc507
Model has 14 quadratic constraints
Model has 21 general constraints
Variable types: 63 continuous, 1555694 integer (1555687 binary)
Coefficient statistics:
  Matrix range     [4e-04, 3e+02]
  QMatrix range    [1e+00, 1e+00]
  Objective range  [1e+01, 2e+01]
  Bounds range     [1e+00, 3e+04]
  RHS range        [1e+00, 2e+04]
  QRHS range       [9e+06, 9e+06]
Presolve removed 88965 rows and 1491092 columns (presolve time = 5s) ...
Presolve removed 88797 rows and 1343750 columns
Presolve time: 7.93s
Presolved: 9367 rows, 212007 columns, 1074521 nonzeros
Presolved model has 14 SOS constraint(s)
Presolved model has 7 bilinear constraint(s)
Variable types: 147356 continuous, 64651 integer (64525 binary)
Deterministic concurrent LP optimizer: primal simplex, dual simplex, and barrier

Showing barrier log only...
Root barrier log...
Ordering time: 0.04s
Barrier statistics:
 AA' NZ     : 1.989e+05
 Factor NZ  : 4.964e+05 (roughly 100 MB of memory)
 Factor Ops : 2.817e+07 (less than 1 second per iteration)
 Threads    : 2

                  Objective                Residual
Iter       Primal          Dual         Primal    Dual     Compl     Time
   0   5.23178726e+06 -1.40362386e+06  3.84e+08 4.23e-01  7.50e+04     9s
   1   1.79113562e+06 -1.52481758e+06  1.44e+08 2.93e+00  2.83e+04     9s
   2   9.60233848e+04 -5.74396568e+05  6.28e+06 3.20e-14  1.25e+03     9s
   3   4.43239445e+03 -2.62861018e+05  2.40e+05 3.73e-14  4.82e+01     9s
   4   1.21867285e+03 -1.57414991e+05  2.84e+04 3.38e-14  6.02e+00    10s
   5   9.53097620e+02 -1.11965662e+05  1.04e+04 2.13e-14  2.29e+00    10s
   6   8.75149146e+02 -6.64253506e+04  4.73e+03 5.68e-14  1.04e+00    10s
   7   8.82955784e+02 -3.91008270e+04  1.94e+03 7.11e-14  4.32e-01    10s
   8   1.04242787e+03 -2.36862306e+04  1.38e+03 7.82e-14  2.60e-01    10s
   9   1.06384719e+03 -1.72552970e+04  9.02e+02 4.26e-14  1.61e-01    10s
  10   1.05617726e+03 -1.13926948e+04  2.95e+02 1.99e-13  6.40e-02    10s
  11   1.05305463e+03 -8.97379027e+03  1.33e+02 1.71e-13  3.94e-02    10s
  12   1.05220100e+03 -8.42702960e+03  9.52e+01 9.95e-14  3.34e-02    10s
  13   1.05185305e+03 -6.81546025e+03  8.08e+01 1.14e-13  2.77e-02    10s

Barrier performed 13 iterations in 9.99 seconds (9.48 work units)
Barrier solve interrupted - model solved by another algorithm
Concurrent spin time: 0.06s
Solved with primal simplex

Root simplex log...
Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
   39965    9.5691301e+02   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00     10s

Root relaxation: objective 9.569130e+02, 39965 iterations, 1.76 seconds (1.44 work units)

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time
     0     0  956.91301    0   97          -  956.91301      -     -   10s
     0     0  956.97926    0   97          -  956.97926      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.04542    0   97          -  957.04542      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.11148    0   97          -  957.11148      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.17744    0   97          -  957.17744      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.24331    0   97          -  957.24331      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.30909    0   97          -  957.30909      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.37477    0   97          -  957.37477      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.44036    0   97          -  957.44036      -     -   10s
     0     0  957.50585    0   97          -  957.50585      -     -   10s
……
     0     0 1013.09994    0  383          - 1013.09994      -     -  380s
     0     2 1013.09994    0  378          - 1013.09994      -     -  394s
     5     2 1015.02368    3  355          - 1014.31056      -  1579  400s
    96    44 1018.32905   18  299          - 1017.48220      -   180  405s
   175   117 1018.41359   28  285          - 1017.48220      -   141  410s
   302   175 1022.88357   49  259          - 1017.48220      -   113  415s
   414   251 1024.07881   66  183          - 1017.48220      -   106  420s
   582   353 1023.52491   91  199          - 1017.48220      -  93.9  425s
   823   523 infeasible  142               - 1017.48220      -  79.8  430s
 ……
 273288 166223 1019.30635   62  210          - 1019.30635      -  17.1 7018s
 273985 166594 1019.46502  156   97          - 1019.30635      -  17.0 7027s
 274624 166910 1023.76780  210   88          - 1019.30635      -  17.0 7042s
 275198 167182 1025.42970  256   88          - 1019.30635      -  17.0 7050s
*275713 165417             344    1025.2196009 1019.30635  0.58%  17.0 7050s
 275824 165367     cutoff  343      1025.21960 1019.30635  0.58%  17.0 7073s
H275826 163265                    1024.4393728 1019.30635  0.50%  17.0 7073s
H275827 154484                    1023.8898198 1019.30635  0.45%  17.0 7073s
 275830 154605 1019.30635   40  251 1023.88982 1019.30635  0.45%  17.0 7090s
H275855 154605                    1023.8895206 1019.30635  0.45%  17.0 7090s
H275994 154605                    1023.8893505 1019.30635  0.45%  17.0 7090s
 275995 154694 1019.30635   42  178 1023.88935 1019.30635  0.45%  17.0 7109s
---
 276859 143703 1019.30635  132   65 1023.61021 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7204s
 276870 143776 1019.30635  133   65 1023.61021 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7223s
H276893 143776                    1023.6065478 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7223s
H276937 143776                    1023.6065144 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7223s
H276961 143315                    1023.5908176 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7223s
 276986 143437 infeasible  175      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  17.0 7238s
 277239 143528     cutoff  199      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  17.1 7255s
 277354 143902 1019.33095   54  111 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  17.1 7271s
 277805 143978 infeasible  153      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  17.1 7289s
 278000 144059     cutoff  174      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  17.1 7304s
 ……
 364098 206499 1019.30635   47  349 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.7 9903s
 364496 206722 1019.30635  107  102 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.7 9915s
 364886 206937 1021.59710  117   78 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.8 9931s
 365173 207153 infeasible  182      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.8 9945s
 365460 207349 1023.52333  185   69 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.9 9957s
 365750 207646 1019.30635   53  192 1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  18.9 9970s
 366119 207779 infeasible  159      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  19.0 9984s
 366430 208014 infeasible   60      1023.59082 1019.30635  0.42%  19.1 9999s

Cutting planes:
  Gomory: 165
  Lift-and-project: 160
  MIR: 335
  StrongCG: 49
  Flow cover: 85
  RLT: 680

Explored 366745 nodes (7161324 simplex iterations) in 10001.77 seconds (7779.83 work units)
Thread count was 8 (of 8 available processors)
Solution count 10: 1023.59 1023.61 1023.61 ... 1023.89
Time limit reached
Best objective 1.023590817558e+03, best bound 1.019306354110e+03, gap 0.4186%

Thank you.