Steven Edwards
Gurobi Staff- Total activity 43
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 7
- Subscriptions 23
Activity overview
Latest activity by Steven Edwards-
Steven Edwards created an article,
Highlights of past Gurobi releases
Detailed release notes are included with each of the major, minor, and technical releases. Here is a brief and non-exhaustive summary of a number of key features that were included in each of our m...
-
Steven Edwards created an article,
How do I request a transfer of my Gurobi license?
Some Gurobi license types work by registering the license to a specific machine. In some cases, the license is registered to a single user on that machine. Note: For all licenses that use our WLS (...
-
Steven Edwards created an article,
Error code 10009: Token validation error (status 8)
The error ERROR 10009: Token Validation Error (status 8) typically indicates that the internal clock of the machine or container running Gurobi is out of sync with our license server. Our license s...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Zahra. What exactly is the error that is raised when you try and add the feasibility cut?
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Johan, Apologies for the delay. It's an interesting idea. Do you mean like an automated tool for advanced user-scaling? If so, I have been playing around with an idea that could be useful for th...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Vadim, I had a quick look and I don't believe there is a way to remove the z variables completely (I might be wrong). Given the equality constraints in solver.addConstr(z[time_interval + 1] =...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Vadim, Thanks for the clarification. Yes, it should be possible to express the model just in terms of the x and y variables. Well really, you only need the first of the x variables, x[0]. From x...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Vadim, Glad to hear you resolved the issue :-). It isn't clear to me what you mean by "define z to be a dictionary and not a variable, Gurobi tells me the model is infeasible". I would encourage...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Official comment Hi Vadim, Thanks for reaching out. I tried running that code you sent through and I get a feasible solution, although slightly different from the one you mention; mine has X=3. It is not clear to m...
-
Steven Edwards commented,
Hi Sean, Thanks for reaching out. That is quite peculiar. I notice that you are using 9.1.1 and also that a Compute Server Worker is involved. Can you first try upgrading to 9.1.2 and seeing whethe...